Skip to main content

Countries

Artificial turf recycling in Netherlands

Recycling infrastructure, regulation, material flows and end-of-life status.

Dataset: FROZEN v1.0Verified: 2026-09-28Sources: 34QA: QA PASSED WITH DOCUMENTED UNKNOWN

01

Executive snapshot

The Netherlands has a long documented history of synthetic-turf recycling and currently has a publicly verified active full-field recycling facility in Amsterdam. Historic processing facilities in Barneveld, Dongen and Tiel are separated from current operational infrastructure. No single current publicly measured national annual EOL tonnage is available. CTE therefore distinguishes between historical public-sector estimates, a current public-input model, facility processing capacity and actual throughput.

Major caveat

CURRENT CTE PUBLIC-INPUT MODEL ESTIMATES APPROXIMATELY 44–48 KT/YEAR (CTE MODEL — PUBLIC INPUTS; not measured throughput, not official statistics, not recycler intake). 60–70 kt/year is a HISTORICAL GOVERNMENT / PUBLIC-SECTOR ESTIMATE. Different time periods, methodologies and assumptions produce different estimates; neither disproves the other.

02

Evidence status

Evidence status

Public source chain validated — data gaps remain

National EOL basis

44–48 kt/y — CTE MODEL — PUBLIC INPUTS

03

Market size & installed base

CURRENT

KNVB 2024: approximately 1,630 football pitches with polymeric infill. ≈200 replaced fields per year (current industry/company sources).

HISTORICAL

HISTORICAL SECTOR DATA (BSNC): ≈2,200 football fields + ≈1,000 hockey fields — not a current census. HISTORICAL GOVERNMENT / PUBLIC-SECTOR ESTIMATE: 60–70 kt/year (2019).

MODELLED

CTE MODEL — PUBLIC INPUTS: ≈200 fields/year × ≈220–240 t/field = 44–48 kt/year.

UNKNOWN

Current measured national EOL tonnage; landscape, hybrid and leisure volumes.

04

End-of-life market

Publicly verified national tonnage

NO CURRENT MEASURED NATIONAL EOL TONNAGE AVAILABLE

CTE MODEL — PUBLIC INPUTS

44–48 kt/year — CTE MODEL — PUBLIC INPUTS (sport only)

HISTORICAL

60–70 kt/year — HISTORICAL GOVERNMENT ESTIMATE (2019)

Uncertainty & methodology

Mass per pitch depends on infill type and system; the field count is a reported annual order of magnitude, not a register.

05

Recycling infrastructure

Infrastructure

  • 2 Active full / multi-fraction recycling sites
  • 0 Active part-stream processing sites
  • 1 Active pre-processors (incl. mobile, no fixed site)
  • 3 Historical / closed sites
  • 0 Development / permit projects

Public data availability

Public capacity available: PARTIAL

Actual throughput available: NO

Units and system definitions differ between facilities; CTE does not rank or total capacity.

06

Facility detail cards

GBN-AGR Amsterdam

operationalFULL-FIELD / MULTI-FRACTION RECYCLER

Santoriniweg 20, 1045 AV Amsterdam, Netherlands

What comes in?
end-of-life synthetic turf (infill + carpet)
What happens?
delivery to Amsterdam, infill removal / separation, washing / cleaning, turf carpet shredding, separation / cleaning, production of recycled turf agglomerate (RTA)
What comes out?
Recycled sand (company reported); Recycled rubber (company reported); Recycled turf agglomerate (RTA) (company reported)
Where does it go?
reuse as infill; drainage sand; industrial flooring; green-roof panels; plastic hockey edge boards; picnic-table components; sports-technical base layers; other recycled plastic products
Capacity
CURRENT 2026 CAPACITY: UNKNOWN — CONFLICTING PUBLIC CAPACITY CLAIMS. Claim A: 2,000,000 m²/year — PUBLICLY REPORTED CAPACITY CLAIM (UBA; source-reported mass equivalent ≈70,000 t/year — not a CTE conversion, not throughput). Claim B: 500,000 m²/year — ESTC 2023 INDUSTRY-REPORTED CAPACITY CLAIM. Neither chosen, not averaged. Actual throughput: UNKNOWN.
Throughput
DATA GAP UNKNOWN
Evidence type
company reported
Last verified
2026-09-28
Data gaps
Throughput

TUF Recycling (Dongen)

closedHISTORICAL PRE-PROCESSOR (infill removal / knocking out of turf) — NOT A FULL-FIELD OR FINAL MATERIAL RECYCLER — NO PIN UNTIL PROCESSING ADDRESS VERIFIED

Vierbundersweg, Tichelrijt, Dongen

What comes in?
sand, sbr, backing
What happens?
intake / storage, infill removal, turf carpet export for further processing
What comes out?
Turf carpet (government study)
Where does it go?
exported to Belgium for further processing
Capacity
HISTORICAL PRE-PROCESSOR (infill removal / knocking out of turf) — not a full-field or final material recycler. No map pin until the exact processing address is verified.
Throughput
DATA GAP UNKNOWN
Evidence type
government source
Last verified
2026-09-28
Data gaps
Throughput

Re-Match Tiel (historical)

historical / bankruptHISTORICAL / BANKRUPT FULL-FIELD PROCESSOR

Panovenweg 12, 4004 JE Tiel, Netherlands

What comes in?
sand, sbr, epdm, tpe, pe, pp, backing
What happens?
dry mechanical downsizing, drying, separation, air-table separation (historical Re-Match process)
What comes out?
historic Re-Match outputs (historic/company description)
Where does it go?
sand, rubber, backing, plastic fibre as secondary raw materials
Capacity
HISTORICAL / BANKRUPT OPERATOR — 55,000 t/year: EARLIER COMPANY-REPORTED DESIGN / PLANNING CLAIM; 70,000 t/year: LATER COMPANY-REPORTED DESIGN CAPACITY CLAIM. Neither is actual throughput. Current throughput: not applicable (historical). Historical actual throughput: UNKNOWN. Excluded from current active capacity.
Throughput
DATA GAP UNKNOWN
Evidence type
industry source
Last verified
2026-09-28
Data gaps
Throughput

Vink (Barneveld) — historical recycler

historicalHISTORICAL MULTI-FRACTION RECYCLER — NO PIN UNTIL PROCESSING ADDRESS VERIFIED

Valkseweg 62, 3771 RG Barneveld (company address); waste site Wencopperweg, Barneveld

What comes in?
turf carpet
What happens?
infill removal, size reduction, separation
What comes out?
Sand (historical public evidence); PE/PP plastic fraction (historical public evidence); Latex backing (historical public evidence)
Where does it go?
mainly drainage applications; drainage-pipe wrapping / plastic applications; not fully recycled; remained in residue
Capacity
HISTORICAL — approx. 35 kt/year public-sector reported. No current throughput verified. Excluded from current active capacity.
Throughput
DATA GAP UNKNOWN
Evidence type
government source
Last verified
2026-09-28
Data gaps
Throughput

CarpetBeater / Schuurman Sport & Infra

operationalMOBILE PRE-PROCESSOR / ON-SITE MATERIAL-SEPARATION PROCESSOR — NOT A FULL-FIELD RECYCLER — NO FIXED FACILITY PIN

Mobile on-site processing at sports-field locations — no fixed processing facility publicly demonstrated

What comes in?
DATA GAP
What happens?
turf uplift, mechanical beating / emptying of the turf carpet, separation of infill from turf, separation of infill layers (possible), rolling / preparation of the emptied turf carpet, preparation of separated fractions for reuse or downstream processing
What comes out?
note; facility_type
Where does it go?
No final material recycling onsite claimed.; MOBILE PRE-PROCESSOR / ON-SITE MATERIAL-SEPARATION PROCESSOR — NOT A FULL-FIELD RECYCLER — NO FIXED FACILITY PIN
Capacity
DATA GAP NO PUBLIC FIGURE IDENTIFIED
Throughput
DATA GAP UNKNOWN
Evidence type
company reported
Last verified
UNKNOWN
Data gaps
Capacity · Throughput

Overdie — Tiel artificial-turf processing site

operationalUNKNOWN

Tiel

What comes in?
DATA GAP
What happens?
DATA GAP
What comes out?
capacity; throughput; evidence_note; evidence_status; methodology_note; output_fractions; final_destination; public_source_url; historical_operator
Where does it go?
UNKNOWN; UNKNOWN; The current operator directly confirms that Overdie operates artificial-turf recycling/processing activities at the Tiel site in Q4 2026.; COMPANY-CONFIRMED — DIRECT OPERATOR STATEMENT; Unlike the standard CTE public-source evidence model, this operational status is based on a direct confirmation from the operator. It is therefore labelled company-confirmed and not independently verified.; UNKNOWN; UNKNOWN; none — direct operator statement; Re-Match Nederland (HISTORICAL / BANKRUPT / CLOSED) — figures not transferred
Capacity
DATA GAP NO PUBLIC FIGURE IDENTIFIED
Throughput
DATA GAP UNKNOWN
Evidence type
company confirmed
Last verified
2026-10-05
Data gaps
Capacity · Throughput

Secondary material market / circular value chain (not recycling infrastructure)

These actors do not physically process end-of-life synthetic turf. They are excluded from recycler counts, the recycler map and capacity figures.

  • GreenMatter — SECONDARY MATERIAL USER / OFF-TAKER / PRODUCT MANUFACTURER — NOT A RECYCLER

07

Material flow

Only steps supported by public evidence are filled. Energy recovery is not material recycling; export and storage are not final destinations.

  1. 1. Field

    PUBLIC EVIDENCE

  2. 2. Removal

    COMPANY-REPORTED

    Delivery to Amsterdam (GBN AGR).

  3. 3. Infill separation

    COMPANY-REPORTED

    Infill removal / separation; washing / cleaning into sand and rubber/granulate fractions.

  4. 4. Turf carpet

    COMPANY-REPORTED

    Turf carpet shredding, separation / cleaning.

  5. 5. Processing

    COMPANY-REPORTED

    Active: GBN AGR Amsterdam. Historical: Vink Barneveld, Re-Match Tiel (bankrupt), TUF Dongen (pre-processing only).

  6. 6. Output fractions

    COMPANY-REPORTED

    Recycled sand · recycled rubber · recycled turf agglomerate (RTA).

  7. 7. Secondary material

    COMPANY-REPORTED

    Sand: infill reuse, drainage sand. Rubber: industrial flooring, green-roof panels. RTA: hockey edge boards, picnic-table parts, base layers. Secondary material user / off-taker: GreenMatter (not a recycler; not counted as recycling capacity).

  8. 8. Final destination

    UNKNOWN

    National material destinations for all output fractions: partly known / partly unknown.

08

Capacity vs throughput

These categories are never added together: capacity is not throughput, a target is not a realised volume, and historical data is not current data.

KNOWN CAPACITY

ACTIVE CAPACITY (active facilities only) — GBN AGR Amsterdam: CURRENT 2026 CAPACITY UNKNOWN — CONFLICTING PUBLIC CAPACITY CLAIMS: 2,000,000 m²/year (publicly reported capacity claim, UBA; ≈70,000 t/year source-reported mass equivalent) vs 500,000 m²/year (ESTC 2023 industry-reported capacity claim). CarpetBeater (mobile pre-processor): capacity UNKNOWN, not in fixed-facility capacity.

KNOWN THROUGHPUT

NO CURRENT PUBLICLY VERIFIED ACTUAL THROUGHPUT FOUND.

UNKNOWN THROUGHPUT

GBN actual current throughput; Re-Match historical actual throughput.

HISTORICAL

Excluded from active capacity and never summed: Re-Match Tiel 55,000 t/year (earlier company-reported design / planning claim) and 70,000 t/year (later company-reported design capacity claim); Vink ≈35 kt/year (historical, public-sector reported); TUF Dongen (historical pre-processor, not recycling capacity).

TARGETS

No active targets; Re-Match design/planning claims are historical — see above.

09

Regulatory context

Current national framework (2026): Circulair Materialenplan (CMP), which replaced LAP3 on 30 December 2025 (circulairmaterialenplan.nl/cmp-vervangt-lap3); whether CMP sets the same synthetic-turf minimum standard is NOT VERIFIED. HISTORICAL — as recorded in v1.0: Landelijk Afvalbeheerplan (LAP3) requires separation into mono-streams (sand, thermoplastics, thermosets, elastomers). EU: REACH restriction on intentionally added microplastics (2023/2055). Guidance and industry practice are shown separately in the source chain.

10

Data gaps

NO PUBLICLY VERIFIED VALUE AVAILABLE — an unknown is a deliberate evidence status, not a missing page element.

  • DATA GAPCURRENT NATIONAL MEASURED EOL TONNAGE — UNKNOWN
  • DATA GAPGBN ACTUAL CURRENT THROUGHPUT — UNKNOWN
  • DATA GAPRE-MATCH HISTORICAL ACTUAL THROUGHPUT — NOT PUBLICLY VERIFIED
  • DATA GAPCURRENT VINK TURF PROCESSING — NO CURRENT OPERATION VERIFIED
  • DATA GAPCURRENT TUF TURF PROCESSING — CLOSED / HISTORICAL
  • DATA GAPCURRENT NATIONAL MATERIAL DESTINATIONS FOR ALL OUTPUT FRACTIONS — PARTLY KNOWN / PARTLY UNKNOWN

11

Sources

Public source chain (33)PUBLIC SOURCE CHAIN VALIDATED — DATA GAPS REMAIN

Each statement: claim → public source → date → evidence label → limitation. Figures are shown separately and never added together.

  • OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT / PROSECUTOR SOURCES · 2016–2020 historical · official_source_verified

    TUF Dongen is a documented historical case involving storage, inspections, enforcement and a 2018 fire; CTE should report only attributed facts from official records.

    Limitation: Wording is neutral. Where relying on the prosecutor's account, statements are attributed explicitly to the OM rather than being presented as an independent CTE conclusion.

    Sources: [1] eerstekamer.nl [2] om.nl

  • INDUSTRY GUIDE · ESTC 2023 reference · industry_reported

    ESTC generic reference composition for a typical filled pitch: 49% sand, 45% performance infill, 3% turf fibres, 2% backing and 1% waste.

    Limitation: This is a generic reference composition. It is not a measured national composition for the Netherlands and is not suitable for all generations of turf or for non-infill systems.

    Sources: [1] estc.info

  • DATA GAP · 2026 · unknown

    Current national actual recycling throughput, route shares and final destinations by material stream are not yet fully verified in the CTE public-source dataset.

    Limitation: This is the principal remaining evidence gap for the Netherlands Impact Map.

  • MULTIPLE PUBLIC SOURCES CONSISTENT · 2026 public order-of-magnitude · official_source_verified

    Around 200 artificial turf sports fields are replaced in the Netherlands each year.

    Limitation: This is an order-of-magnitude estimate for replacement activity and not a complete national administrative count. Field sizes and the types of sports played on them vary.

    Sources: [1] sportinnovator.nl [2] greenmatter.nl [3] open.overheid.nl

  • CTE MODEL — PUBLIC INPUTS · 2026 model · cte_model

    CTE model: approximately 44–48 kt/year of gross end-of-life material if ~200 replaced pitches are modelled using the ESTC average full-size pitch mass of 220–240 tonnes.

    Limitation: Formula: 200 fields/year × 220–240 tonnes/field ÷ 1000. This is not a measured national waste statistic and it assumes the ESTC full-size pitch reference is representative of the mix of Dutch fields being replaced.

    Sources: [1] sportinnovator.nl [2] estc.info

  • GOVERNMENT-COMMISSIONED HISTORICAL SOURCE · 2019 historical · official_source_verified

    Historical government reference: the 2019 Dutch study considered 60–70 kt/year a directional estimate; 240 fields expected in 2019 corresponded to about 58 kt.

    Limitation: This is a historical reference only and is not a measured volume for the current year 2026.

    Sources: [1] open.overheid.nl

  • · company_reported

    CarpetBeater / Schuurman Sport & Infra — mobile pre-processor / on-site material-separation processor: mechanical emptying of turf carpet, infill removal and separation, rolling emptied carpet for reuse or downstream treatment. Not a full-field recycler. Capacity and throughput UNKNOWN.

    Sources: [1] carpetbeater.nl

  • COMPANY REPORTED + PUBLIC PERMIT RECORD · current company status · company_reported

    AGR Amsterdam has been operational at Santoriniweg 20 since June 2020.

    Limitation: The operational status is public information. This statement does not establish the licensed capacity or the actual annual throughput.

    Sources: [1] artificialgrassrecycling.eu [2] zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl

  • INDUSTRY GUIDE / COMPANY-REPORTED CAPACITY · 2023 · company_reported

    ESTC's 2023 facility guide listed GBN-AGR with a facility processing capacity of 500,000 m²/year. ESTC 2023 INDUSTRY-REPORTED CAPACITY CLAIM — conflicts with the 2,000,000 m²/year public claim; current 2026 capacity UNKNOWN.

    Limitation: This is a dated capacity figure. It is not the verified throughput for the current year 2026 and is not the licensed capacity.

    Sources: [1] estc.info

  • NO PUBLIC DATA IDENTIFIED · 2026 · unknown

    No numerical licensed capacity for AGR Amsterdam has yet been identified in the CTE public-source chain.

    Limitation: The existence of a permit and changes to the process are public information, but a numeric licensed tonnage has not been established in this dataset.

    Sources: [1] zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl

  • COMPANY REPORTED · current company reporting · company_reported

    AGR publicly reports three main outputs: recycled sand, cleaned rubber granulate and recycled turf agglomerate (RTA), with applications including sports infill/drainage sand, industrial rubber products/green-roof panels, and plastic boards/furniture/sports underlayers.

    Limitation: These are company-reported outlet categories. They do not constitute a verified national mass balance or a verified annual final destination on a buyer-by-buyer basis.

    Sources: [1] artificialgrassrecycling.eu

  • DATA GAP · 2026 · unknown

    Current verified annual throughput for AGR Amsterdam has not yet been established in the CTE public-source dataset.

    Limitation: Installed processing capacity should not be used as a substitute for actual throughput.

  • PUBLICLY REPORTED PROCESSING CAPACITY · industry_source

    GBN AGR Amsterdam has a publicly reported processing capacity of 2,000,000 m²/year. A German federal environmental study (UBA) reported this as approximately 70,000 t/year — a source-reported equivalent, not a CTE calculation. Not throughput.

    Limitation: Publicly reported capacity; the tonne figure is source-reported. Not actual throughput.

    Sources: [1] umweltbundesamt.de

  • Actor role · company_reported

    GreenMatter B.V. (Nieuw-Vennep, Sneek) makes products such as outdoor furniture, retaining/water-edge products, sports flooring and edging from recovered artificial-turf materials, including recycled turf fibres, SBR infill and recycled turf agglomerate. CTE classification: DOWNSTREAM SECONDARY-MATERIAL USER / PRODUCT MANUFACTURER — not a primary end-of-life turf recycler; not counted in national recycling capacity.

    Limitation: Downstream use of recyclate; not EOL processing capacity.

    Sources: [1] greenmatter.nl

  • DATA GAP · 2026 · unknown

    No current publicly verified licensed, installed or actual annual artificial-turf throughput figure for the Tiel site is included in this public source chain.

    Limitation: No current capacity, permit, or production figures for the Tiel site are described.

    Sources: [1] zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl

  • Operator status · official_source_verified

    Re-Match Netherlands B.V., which operated the artificial-turf recycling facility at Panovenweg 12 in Tiel from late 2022 / 2023 ramp-up, was declared bankrupt in February 2025. CTE classifies it as a HISTORICAL / BANKRUPT FACILITY OPERATOR.

    Limitation: No later operator, ownership, permit or production is described.

    Sources: [1] insolventietracker.nl [2] adst.nl

  • COMPANY-REPORTED DESIGN CAPACITY (HISTORICAL) · company_reported

    Re-Match announced a design capacity of 70,000 tonnes/year during construction of the Tiel facility. COMPANY-REPORTED DESIGN CAPACITY — historical; not actual throughput, not current capacity and not current Dutch market capacity.

    Limitation: Historical design claim; excluded from active capacity.

    Sources: [1] re-match.com

  • COMPANY-REPORTED TARGET (HISTORICAL) · company_reported

    A 2023 source reported planned full-scale production of approximately 55,000 tonnes of recycled material per year at Tiel. COMPANY-REPORTED TARGET / PLANNED FULL-RATE OUTPUT — not verified actual throughput.

    Limitation: Target, not realised output.

    Sources: [1] re-match.com

  • Facility role (historical) · official_source_verified

    At TUF Recycling in Dongen, artificial turf was accepted and infill was mainly removed on site; the turf carpet was exported to Belgium for further processing. A Dutch government study stated there was no installation on site that fully recycled artificial turf in accordance with the national waste-management standard. CTE classification: HISTORICAL PRE-PROCESSING / COLLECTION FACILITY — not a full-field recycler.

    Limitation: Stored tonnages (e.g. ~13,000 t stockpiled turf) are not recycling throughput.

    Sources: [1] open.overheid.nl [2] eerstekamer.nl

  • HISTORICAL REPORTED PROCESSING CAPACITY · official_source_verified

    Historically, Vink in Barneveld processed artificial turf through infill removal, size reduction and separation into sand (mainly drainage applications), rubber/other infill and a PE/PP fraction (used for drainage-pipe wrapping / plastic applications); latex backing was not fully recycled and remained in residue. A government-linked publication described approximately 35 kt/year historical processing capacity. Vink stopped accepting new artificial turf in 2018. HISTORICAL — NO CURRENT ARTIFICIAL TURF INTAKE VERIFIED.

    Limitation: Historical; excluded from current Dutch capacity; no 2026 operation inferred.

    Sources: [1] open.overheid.nl [2] nos.nl

  • DATA GAP WITH GOVERNMENT SCOPE NOTE · 2026 data gap / 2019 scope note · unknown

    No current national public estimate of annual landscaping-turf end-of-life tonnage has yet been identified. The 2019 government study explicitly excluded non-sport turf from its Dutch waste estimate.

    Limitation: Estimates for end-of-life sports turf should not be merged with those for landscaping turf.

    Sources: [1] open.overheid.nl

  • EU AUTHORITATIVE · EU rule · official_source_verified

    For granular polymeric infill used on artificial sports surfaces, the EU placing-on-market restriction starts to apply on 17 October 2031.

    Limitation: This is not a blanket ban on artificial turf pitches.

    Sources: [1] echa.europa.eu

  • INDUSTRY GUIDE · ESTC 2023 reference · industry_reported

    ESTC reference for a full-size synthetic turf pitch: around 10 years average life, around 7,000 m² and 220–240 tonnes.

    Limitation: This is a generic European reference; the actual size, composition, use, and service life of Dutch fields vary.

    Sources: [1] estc.info

  • · industry_reported

    BSNC commissioned Rebel Group to conduct an independent exploration into the usefulness and necessity of Extended Producer Responsibility (UPV/EPR) for artificial turf, shockpads and e-layers. A workshop on 2 September 2026 tested the first system map and identified key barriers to circularity with suppliers, contractors, municipalities, sports companies, recyclers and industry organisations.

    Not a facility census; never used for recycler counts or capacity. Held as draft: no source URL supplied by ChatGPT.

    Sources: [1] bsnc.nl

  • OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT FRAMEWORK · current 2026 · official_source_verified

    The Dutch CMP minimum standard requires used artificial turf to be sorted or otherwise processed to separate as many monostreams as possible, including sand, thermoplastics, thermosets and elastomers where present.

    Limitation: The exact scope of the CMP and the referenced waste plans must be applied to each separated fraction.

    Sources: [1] circulairmaterialenplan.nl

  • OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT FRAMEWORK · current 2026 · official_source_verified

    Under the CMP, cleaned PE/PP turf material must be recycled according to the plastics waste plan; separated sand is to be recycled, and its quality must meet applicable soil/material requirements for the intended use.

    Limitation: This should not be generalised to a statement that every recovered batch is automatically a product or is suitable for reuse in sports applications.

    Sources: [1] circulairmaterialenplan.nl

  • OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT FRAMEWORK · current 2026 · official_source_verified

    The CMP lists Eural code 17 09 04 as an indicative code that may relate to artificial-turf waste within the plan's scope.

    Limitation: The CMP explicitly states that this code is indicative; the correct Eural code must be determined for the actual waste stream in question.

    Sources: [1] circulairmaterialenplan.nl

  • OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT FRAMEWORK · current 2026 · official_source_verified

    The CMP does not provide one automatic artificial-turf End-of-Waste status; after preparation for reuse or recycling, End-of-Waste is assessed case by case under the Dutch Environmental Management Act/CMP based on all facts and circumstances.

    Limitation: The fact that a material is being processed or sold does not by itself establish End-of-Waste status.

    Sources: [1] circulairmaterialenplan.nl

  • OFFICIAL NL + EU LAW · current 2026 · official_source_verified

    Cross-border shipments of artificial-turf waste from or to the Netherlands are assessed under the CMP turf framework together with Regulation (EU) 2024/1157; the new EU waste-shipment regulation applies from 21 May 2026.

    Limitation: The procedure depends on the classification, composition, destination, and the recovery or disposal route.

    Sources: [1] circulairmaterialenplan.nl [2] eur-lex.europa.eu

  • INDUSTRY TECHNICAL REPORT · 2021 historical · industry_reported

    Historical BSNC reference (2021): approximately 2,200 artificial football fields and 1,000 artificial hockey fields in the Netherlands.

    Limitation: This is a historical figure that excludes other sports, landscaping, and leisure applications. It is not the total for the current year 2026.

    Sources: [1] bsnc.nl

  • SPORTS GOVERNING BODY · 2024-05 · industry_reported

    KNVB stated in May 2024 that the Netherlands had 1,630 artificial football fields with polymeric infill.

    Limitation: This figure is a subset, representing only football fields with polymeric infill. It is not the total number of artificial turf fields.

    Sources: [1] knvb.nl

  • DATA GAP · 2026 · unknown

    A current complete national count covering sport, landscaping, hybrid and leisure has not yet been identified in the CTE public-source dataset.

    Limitation: Stream-specific counts should be kept separate. A total should not be extrapolated from older counts for football and hockey.

  • DATA GAP · 2026 · unknown

    No current country-wide annual tonnage of Dutch end-of-life artificial turf exported in 2026 has yet been identified in the CTE public-source dataset.

    Limitation: Historical export permissions for Re-Match are not representative of current shipment volume.

All public sources (deduplicated) (34)

Each URL is listed once; the claim-source links above are preserved per statement.

  1. AD — Tuf Recycling voor Kerst volledig geruimd · ad.nl
  2. Aan de Stegge — Aan de Stegge — Re-Match Tiel · adst.nl · 1 statements
  3. Artificial Grass Recycling B.V. / AGR — AGR — 100% circular processing of old artificial grass · artificialgrassrecycling.eu · 2 statements
  4. Brabants Dagblad — Analyse: de gebakken peren van TUF Recycling · bd.nl
  5. BSNC — Denk mee over een circulaire kunstgrasketen (20 August 2026) · bsnc.nl · 1 statements
  6. BSNC — BSNC Rapport Zorgplicht 2021 · bsnc.nl · 1 statements
  7. CarpetBeater / Schuurman Sport & Infra — CarpetBeater · carpetbeater.nl · 1 statements
  8. Dutch Government / CMP — Circulair Materialenplan — Ketenplan Kunstgras · circulairmaterialenplan.nl · 5 statements
  9. Environmental Impact Assessment Review — Environmental impacts of artificial turf at end of life · doi.org
  10. European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) — Granules and mulches on sports pitches and playgrounds · echa.europa.eu · 1 statements
  11. Dutch Government / Parliament — Government letter concerning TUF Recycling · eerstekamer.nl · 2 statements
  12. EMEA Synthetic Turf Council (ESTC) — Recycling Facilities for Synthetic Turf Systems in Europe · estc.info · 4 statements
  13. EUR-Lex — Regulation (EU) 2024/1157 on shipments of waste · eur-lex.europa.eu · 1 statements
  14. European Commission / EUR-Lex — Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/2055 · eur-lex.europa.eu
  15. Rechtbank Gelderland via Faillissementsdossier — Faillissement Re-Match Netherlands B.V. (F.05/25/52) · faillissementsdossier.nl
  16. GreenMatter — Werkbezoek: de noodzaak van circulaire verwerking van kunstgrasvelden · greenmatter.nl · 2 statements
  17. Insolventietracker — Re-Match Netherlands bankruptcy record · insolventietracker.nl · 1 statements
  18. KNVB — Agenda voorjaarsvergadering ledenraad amateurvoetbal 25 mei 2024 · knvb.nl · 1 statements
  19. NOS — Omstreden recyclingbedrijf stopt verwerking afgedankt kunstgras (10 Nov 2018) · nos.nl · 1 statements
  20. Openbaar Ministerie — Boete en werkstraf geëist voor kunstgrasberg · om.nl · 1 statements
  21. Omroep Brabant — Geen enkele kunstgrasmat meer naar TUF Recycling · omroepbrabant.nl
  22. Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management / Gemax — Verwerking van kunstgras — huidige verwerking in een aantal Europese landen en mogelijkheden voor toekomstige verwerking in Nederland · open.overheid.nl · 5 statements
  23. Re-Match — Re-Match announcement (31.01.2022, PDF) · re-match.com · 1 statements
  24. Re-Match — Kunstgrasrecycler Re-Match viert eerste paal van nieuwbouw · re-match.com · 1 statements
  25. Re-Match — Dutch Re-Match factory building completed · re-match.com
  26. RecyclePro — GBN-AGR is van start gegaan met recycling van kunstgras · recyclepro.eu
  27. European Commission — Explanatory Guide to the microplastics restriction, Part II · single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu
  28. Sportinnovator — RSI maakt kunstgras volledig circulair · sportinnovator.nl · 2 statements
  29. Umweltbundesamt — UBA Texte 31/2022 — Evaluation der Erfassung und Verwertung ausgewählter Abfallströme · umweltbundesamt.de · 1 statements
  30. Municipality of Amsterdam / Omgevingsdienst Noordzeekanaalgebied — Application permit — Santoriniweg 20, Amsterdam — process optimisations · zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl · 2 statements
  31. Municipality of Tiel / Omgevingsdienst Rivierenland — Permit application for moving, treating and processing a depot at Panovenweg, Tiel · zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl · 1 statements
  32. Gemax / Ministerie van IenW — Verwerking van kunstgras — Gemax, commissioned by the Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management (Feb 2019) · zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl
  33. Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Waterstaat — Kamerbrief verwerkingsmogelijkheden kunstgras · zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl
  34. Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Waterstaat — Kamerbrief brand TUF Recycling (29517-146) · zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl

12

CTE data quality

Claims

33

Sources

34

Claim-source links

38

Facilities

6

Official / regulatory sources

4

Last audited

2026-09-28

Final status: QA PASSED WITH DOCUMENTED UNKNOWN — QA PASSED — FROZEN (v1.0, 29 Sep 2026)